Homo Economicus is also a social animal; ergo, he can be taxed (all but costlessly)
by Michael Keren
Start page: 243 - End page: 263
Keywords: Social utility function; inequality; taxation and incentives
Jel code: D11; D31; H21
DOI: 10.25428/1824-2979/042
Abstract:
Can rising income inequality be reduced by taxation without harming incentives? Yes, it can, when account is taken of man as a social animal who therefore seeks social status. What counts for social status is not our absolute resources but where we stand relative to others. The more incomes surpass subsistence needs, the more grows most people’s desire for social standing. Therefore, any tax that leaves our rank unaffected will not harm our effort. Consequently, at very high incomes proportional taxes, despite maintaining progressivity and reducing inequality, should not distort incentives. A status game provides the paper’s theoretical framework.
View this article (PDF)
In case of problems please write an e-mail to
[email protected]
Publisher perpetually authorizes participants in the LOCKSS system to archive and restore EJCE articles through the LOCKSS System for the benefit of all LOCKSS System participants. EJCE is registered as OAI-PMH data provider.
OAI -
Records check.
EJCE, 2018- : Registro stampa Trib. Busto Arsizio n. 7/18 del 13.07.2018; Direttore responsabile: Laura Ballestra, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC c.so Matteotti 22 20153 Castellanza VA
EJCE, 2004-2017: Supplemento a LIUC Papers, Registro stampa Trib. Busto Arsizio n. 11/93 del 11.06.1993; Direttore responsabile: Laura Ballestra, Università Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC c.so Matteotti 22 20153 Castellanza VA